Of Competition, Collaboration & Feedback
[Picture-less entry... Sorry to disappoint!! =))]
We played yet another game in Management Practice yesterday. As soon as the lecturers finished announcing the rules, I shouted excitedly,"It's US against THEM (the lecturers)!!" because as long as any team submits a wrong answer to the puzzle, the lecturers will take all in the money bag (we each put in GBP2 while the lecturers put in more into the money bag). To make things more complicated, at least 4 out of 6 tasks required all teams to share information before a solution could be found. On top of that, I see no point in engaging in any antagonistic behaviour as we have another 10 months to go before the end of the course.
Surprisingly, at least one team in our Stream did not go with the flow, and apparently, the teams in the other Stream did not attempt to collaborate much. I think Erik asked an interesting question in class, i.e. whether people saw these games as merely games or that they have an impact on our relationships with one another. To me, the interesting bit is not so much whether there were indeed 2 camps, but more the fact that it was possible to see the consequences as different, separate and/or mutually exclusive.
Today, the MBA Director (the one with the same jacket as 'Good Fren') had a session with us. Where we were first fed a free lunch, then were asked for our feedback. Nothing in Life in free, especially in Business School. =))
When 'Good Fren' raised his hand to contribute his views, the MBA Director went,"Ahh... 'GOOD FREN'!!"
Win oredi... I wonder if my graduate scroll will read,"Blinkymummy Lee", and his "Good Fren Tan"
As I observed the session, I was trying to imagine something like that happening in NUS, and/or any other familiar Asian context. Asking for feedback from a crowd of 140+ in the flesh is really not an easy feat. This little para would have been my positive contribution.
Posted on 10/31/2008 06:30:00 AM by BLINKYMUMMY and filed under
mba
| 3 Comments »
We played yet another game in Management Practice yesterday. As soon as the lecturers finished announcing the rules, I shouted excitedly,"It's US against THEM (the lecturers)!!" because as long as any team submits a wrong answer to the puzzle, the lecturers will take all in the money bag (we each put in GBP2 while the lecturers put in more into the money bag). To make things more complicated, at least 4 out of 6 tasks required all teams to share information before a solution could be found. On top of that, I see no point in engaging in any antagonistic behaviour as we have another 10 months to go before the end of the course.
Surprisingly, at least one team in our Stream did not go with the flow, and apparently, the teams in the other Stream did not attempt to collaborate much. I think Erik asked an interesting question in class, i.e. whether people saw these games as merely games or that they have an impact on our relationships with one another. To me, the interesting bit is not so much whether there were indeed 2 camps, but more the fact that it was possible to see the consequences as different, separate and/or mutually exclusive.
Today, the MBA Director (the one with the same jacket as 'Good Fren') had a session with us. Where we were first fed a free lunch, then were asked for our feedback. Nothing in Life in free, especially in Business School. =))
When 'Good Fren' raised his hand to contribute his views, the MBA Director went,"Ahh... 'GOOD FREN'!!"
Win oredi... I wonder if my graduate scroll will read,"Blinkymummy Lee", and his "Good Fren Tan"
As I observed the session, I was trying to imagine something like that happening in NUS, and/or any other familiar Asian context. Asking for feedback from a crowd of 140+ in the flesh is really not an easy feat. This little para would have been my positive contribution.


